Summary:
-
General Brown Faces Tough Questions in Confirmation HearingAs General Charles Q. Brown Jr. prepares to take the hot seat for his confirmation hearing to become the next Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, he faces a grueling test of his leadership abilities.
-
As General Charles Q. Brown Jr. faces his confirmation hearing to become the next Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, he may also face tough questions from conservative senators on a variety of Pentagon policies they view as a distraction from the military’s core mission of fighting the nation’s wars.
-
Brown’s experience in the Pacific gives him credibility Brown’s experience commanding Pacific Air Forces will be a valuable asset in his pitch to senators.
-
General Brown’s confirmation as Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff comes at a time of increasing concern about deterring China from invading Taiwan.
-
Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. Charles Q. Brown Jr.’s response to a prediction made by Gen. Mike Minihan, the head of Air Mobility Command, regarding a possible war with China in two years, has raised questions about his own views on the possibility of a conflict with China.
General Brown Faces Tough Questions in Confirmation Hearing
As General Charles Q. Brown Jr. prepares to take the hot seat for his confirmation hearing to become the next Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, he faces a grueling test of his leadership abilities. Unlike his smooth confirmation three years ago, this time around, Brown can expect to face some tough questions from senators about pressing national security issues.
China’s Aggressive Posture towards Taiwan
One of the key issues that is likely to come up in the confirmation hearing is China’s increasingly aggressive military posture towards Taiwan. Senators will want to know how Brown plans to address this issue, and he will need to outline a clear strategy for defending Taiwan while avoiding direct conflict with China. Brown may emphasize the importance of strong deterrence measures and the need for continued cooperation with regional allies.
Ukraine’s Ongoing Conflict with Russia
Another major issue that senators are likely to focus on is the ongoing conflict between Ukraine and Russia. Brown may need to address concerns about how the US military can support Ukraine in its efforts to defend its sovereignty while also working to find a diplomatic solution to the conflict. He may emphasize the importance of maintaining a strong, unified NATO alliance in the face of Russian aggression.
Conservative Criticism of Diversity Policies
Conservatives have been vocal in their criticism of the military’s diversity policies, which they claim are a distraction from the military’s primary mission. Brown will need to address these concerns while also defending the importance of diversity and inclusion in the military. He may argue that diversity makes the military stronger and more effective, and that it is crucial for building a cohesive and effective fighting force.
Brown’s Previous Hearing Performances
Finally, senators are likely to refer to Brown’s previous hearing performances as an indicator of his suitability for the position. Brown has been described as a cool, even-tempered, and direct leader, but the questions he faced in previous hearings were related to the Air Force, within his comfort zone. Brown will need to demonstrate his ability to think strategically and respond effectively to tough questions on a range of national security issues.
Conservative Senators Question Diversity and Other Biden Policies
As General Charles Q. Brown Jr. faces his confirmation hearing to become the next Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, he may also face tough questions from conservative senators on a variety of Pentagon policies they view as a distraction from the military’s core mission of fighting the nation’s wars.
Republican Opposition to Diversity and Climate Change Policies
Conservatives have largely opposed efforts by the Biden administration to promote diversity and combat the effects of climate change in the military. These policies have been viewed by some Republicans as a distraction from the military’s main focus of fighting wars. Both Milley and Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin have faced questions on these issues during their appearances on Capitol Hill. Milley, in particular, has defended the military against criticism that it is distracted by these programs.
Brown’s Personal Experience with Racism in the Military
General Brown, who is the highest-ranking Black military leader since Colin Powell chaired the Joint Chiefs in the early 1990s, has spoken out about his own experiences with racism in the military. In a powerful video following the murder of George Floyd in the summer of 2020, Brown reflected on the challenges he faced as one of the few Black pilots. Conservative senators may question Brown’s commitment to diversity policies and how they impact military readiness.
Pressure to Reverse Access to Abortion for Troops
Senator Tommy Tuberville of Alabama, among others, may pressure General Brown on policies implemented by Defense Secretary Austin to provide troops with access to abortion services. Republicans argue that this politicizes the military and violates laws that bar taxpayer funding for abortions. Democrats have praised the move, but conservatives want it reversed. In response, Brown has emphasized the Air Force’s responsibility to comply with the law while also taking care of airmen and their families.
General Charles Q. Brown Jr.’s confirmation hearing promises to be a challenging test of his leadership abilities, as he navigates questions on a range of national security issues, including China’s military posture towards Taiwan, Ukraine’s ongoing conflict with Russia, and Pentagon policies on diversity, climate change, and access to abortion. Brown will need to demonstrate his strategic thinking skills, his ability to respond effectively to tough questions, and his commitment to building a strong and effective fighting force.
Russia and Ukraine
Brown’s views on the Ukraine war have been less publicized than Milley’s, but when he has spoken on the topic, he’s made headlines. With his experience as the lead for strategic deterrence and nuclear integration at U.S. Air Forces in Europe just before Russia invaded Ukraine in 2014, Brown brings a unique perspective to the table.
At the Aspen Security Forum in the summer of 2022, Milley refrained from commenting on the possibility of offering Ukraine Western fighter jets and pilot training. However, Brown offered some speculation on the matter, stating that the U.S. has a responsibility to train its allies and to meet Ukraine’s needs. Charles Q. Brown Jr. also mentioned several different aircraft that could potentially be sent to Ukraine, excluding MiGs with a lighthearted comment about the difficulty of getting parts from the Russians in the future.
Brown may face questioning from senators such as Mark Kelly, Tammy Duckworth, Tim Kaine, and Tommy Tuberville, who have expressed interest in sending F-16 jets to Ukraine, as well as the possibility of sending uncrewed aircraft. However, top civilian officials have stated that ground-based air defenses such as Ukraine’s S-300s, German IRIS-Ts, or newly arrived Patriots should take precedence over fighter jets.
Charles Q. Brown Jr. has praised Ukraine’s use of air defense capabilities, both donated and indigenous, which have helped threaten Russian air power and maintain air superiority over Ukraine. Brown’s unique perspective on the situation in Ukraine could prove invaluable in the ongoing debate over how best to support Ukraine against Russian aggression.
Brown faces questions on deterring China from invading Taiwan
As the newly appointed Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Charles Q. Brown Jr. faces a Senate that has become increasingly concerned about deterring China from invading Taiwan in the coming years. With both Democrats and Republicans pushing for increased military funding in the Indo-Pacific region and arms sales to Taiwan, Brown will likely be asked about the Pentagon’s plans to arm the self-governing island and position the military to better respond to potential threats from China.
The window to buy necessary weapons and equipment is closing
Top Senate Armed Services Republican, Roger Wicker, has expressed concern that the Pentagon isn’t moving quickly enough to arm Taiwan, arguing that the window to purchase necessary weapons and equipment may be closing before the end of the decade. As such, Brown will need to address these concerns and explain how he plans to adapt the military to focus on great power competition with China, as well as other countries such as Russia, Iran, and North Korea.
Brown’s experience in the Pacific gives him credibility
Brown’s experience commanding Pacific Air Forces will be a valuable asset in his pitch to senators. He has firsthand experience dealing with the challenges posed by China and will likely draw on that experience to spur the military to adapt to the Pacific. As Arnold Punaro, a former staff director for the Senate Armed Services Committee, notes, Brown’s experience will give him “credibility” in driving joint operations to deal with the threats posed not only by China, but also other countries in the region.
General Charles Q. Brown Jr. confirmation as Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff comes at a time of increasing concern about deterring China from invading Taiwan. With his experience in the Pacific and expertise in military strategy, Brown will need to address these concerns and explain how he plans to adapt the military to better respond to potential threats in the region.
Air Force Chief’s Response to War Prediction Raises Questions on Conflict with China
Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. Charles Q. Brown Jr.’s response to a prediction made by Gen. Mike Minihan, the head of Air Mobility Command, regarding a possible war with China in two years, has raised questions about his own views on the possibility of a conflict with China. While testifying before Congress, top leaders have given a wide range of answers on whether and when China might invade Taiwan, but Brown’s response to Minihan’s prediction suggests a sense of urgency. In the memo, Minihan wrote, “My gut tells me we will fight in 2025,” and urged his leaders to “aim for the head.” When asked about the memo, Brown expressed disappointment with some aspects of it but emphasized the importance of a sense of urgency in dealing with the threat posed by China. The question remains: will China invade Taiwan, and how soon? While the answer is far from clear, Brown’s comments suggest that he takes the possibility seriously and is committed to preparing the military for any eventuality.
Senate deadlock over military promotions threatens to delay confirmation of General Brown
The Senate’s partisan deadlock over confirming military promotions is causing a backlog in senior military officer picks, potentially delaying key appointments to important posts. This issue could impact General Charles Q. Brown Jr.’s nomination for Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, as it has prevented the confirmation of any nominees for general or admiral ranks in recent months.
Senator Tuberville has blocked the swift confirmation of all senior military officer picks since February, citing his objection to policies implemented by the Pentagon. This has resulted in a stalemate that could harm military readiness as commanders leave their posts or retire without being replaced by permanent leaders. Even former U.S. defense secretaries have opposed the blockade, emphasizing the need for timely appointments to key positions.
There is a way to bypass this obstruction: Majority Leader Chuck Schumer could hold a cloture vote on Brown’s nomination, a procedural tactic to break the Senate’s deadlock. However, Democrats may not want to wait until the last minute to take this step, as Tuberville argues that he is not blocking the confirmation of any nominees, but simply asking the Senate to take time to vote on them. The longer this impasse continues, the greater the likelihood that it will impact the nomination of General Brown, as well as other important military appointments.
