Of course, US military spending is astronomically high—exceeding that of the following nine nations. The real stinger, though, is this In its budget submissions to Congress, the Pentagon (a body that has never successfully passed a thorough financial audit) doesn’t even ask for all those yearly spending increases. Instead, the House and Senate still grant it more funding each year in the tens of billions. Regardless, Lloyd Austin, the secretary of defence, has publicly indicated that the Pentagon doesn’t require such sums in specific the capabilities…to support our operational ideas.”

It would be one thing if a thoughtful defence policy east planned this additional funding. Most of the time, however, a sizable portion of it is used for either itemsitemhe the Pentagon’s want lists (formerly known as “unfunded priorities lists”) or multibillion-dollar weapons programmes built in the districts or states of influential congressmen. How sIt is a mystery how things can be “priorities” when they haven’t even been included in the Pentagon’s massive official budget request. The department’s capacity to accomplish programme objectives and delivery deadlines will also be further strained if it is given additional funding because it cannot manage its current budget. So in r, in reality, it reduces military readiness. The Pentagon’s remaining economic restrainturther eroded by Congress’ arbitrary budget increases, despite widespread management failures that result in ongoing cost overruns and delivery delays on some of the military’s most costly (and ill-conceived) weapons systems.

In other words, local issues and politics based on special interests frequently take precedence over anything deemed to be in the national interest, which is detrimental to the safety and security of the United States. Most of these additional monies ultimately servebolstersprofit margins of signipowerfulons manufacturers like Lockheed Martin and Raytheon Technologies. As legislative proponents of increased Pentagon spending frequently asserted, they undoubtedly don’t assist our military personnel.